·
To
be able to
·
define
operations research, describe the historical - development of O.R.,
·
explain
the services offered by an operations researcher, and
·
describe
the major steps involved in solving an O.R. problem.
Most
definitions emphasise the use of techniques of several disciplines (statistics,
accounting, computer science, etc.) to assist management in improving its
decision making . For example:
By
the term decision making we mean selecting from a set of alternatives -
it is making a choice. The decision
making process (or problem solving) refers to the entire sequence of
steps from identifying a problem through to its solution.
As technology has developed, industrial organisations have become more complex. The owner/manager has been replaced by specialised components in an organisation - production, finance, personnel, marketing, research and development.
Early
assistance in the production area was provided by Frederick W. Taylor[4],
Frank and Lillian Gilbreth[5]
and Gantt[6]
in the field of industrial engineering with time and motion studies, work
simplification and plant layout. Henri Fayol[7]
attempted to extend the management principles to administration without
success. The time was not ripe for such
a concept.
The
period of World War II saw the military management in the United Kingdom call
on a team of scientists (under the management of Professor P.M.S. Blackett in
1939) to study strategic and tactical problems associated with air and land
defence. The name operations research
was apparently coined because the team was dealing with research into military
operations. In the United States similar
groups were formed in 1942 by the military management with applications to
logistic problems, flight pattern determination, sea mining planning and
effective utilisation of electronics equipment.
Following
the war, industrial managers turned to O.R. to aid in coordinating the
individual goals of the specialised activities of the organisations which were
sometimes not consistent with the overall goals. Clearly this was stimulated by
the availability of digital computers.
In 1950, O.R. became a recognised profession with the founding of the
Operations Research Society of Great Britain.
In 1953, the Operations Research Society of America was formed and
within a year a similar group, The Institute of Management Science was
founded. In Australia, there is an
active group - The Australian Society of Operations Research (ASOR) - with
Chapter organisations in most capital cities and a number of regional centres.
In
the early 1960's universities commenced programmes in O.R. and new O.R.
publications developed. O.R. had become
a recognised academic pursuit. Computer power and availability increased,
enabling analysts of O.R. to find employment almost everywhere in industry and
more recently in the study of non-industrial social systems, for example, fire
control, hospital organisation, community planning, pollution control and
police work.
The
scientific method has evolved out of the practical experience of many
scientists - astronomers, chemists, physicists, biologists etc. Sir Francis Bacon has generally been
credited with being the first to formally describe the method nearly four
hundred years ago. The steps an O.R.
analyst takes, once the existence of a problem is suspected, are detailed
below.
This
means identifying the components of the decision problem. First, who has the authority and/or major
responsibility for control of the system (and who in fact is controlling the
system)? It may require a thorough
systems analysis at this stage to identify the decision-makers and their
inter-relationships.
Second,
identify the available actions and consequent outcomes and establish the
decision-makers' preferences for the outcomes.
Identify the sources of uncertainty which make it clear how the
preferred outcome can be directly achieved.
Sources of data and information that might be used to reduce or
eliminate the uncertainties are sought at this stage.
A
model is simply a representation of the system. Models are of three general kinds:
· Iconic
- physical one-to-one representations,
for example, maps or scale models;
· Analogue - representation of one physical system by another, for example,
electronic circuitry to represent an hydraulic system; and
· Symbolic - mathematical, for instance, representation of a system by a set of
equations.
It
is the third model which is most frequently used in operations research, and it
is usually prescriptive in that it contains:
(i)
the
outcomes, or more generally, the probability of each outcome as a function of
the available actions;
(ii)
a
function of the outcomes which measures the preference for the outcomes; and
(iii)
the
criterion of choice to be used in selecting the best action.
A
model containing only (i) is a descriptive model only. With (ii) and (iii) the researcher may
proceed to:
This
is the mathematical solution. Sometimes
existing mathematical techniques are inadequate so that a `deterministic'
solution cannot be obtained and the analyst must obtain an approximate solution
either by heuristic or simulation methods.
·
Heuristic methods commence with an initial
solution to the model and utilise rules to successively improve the solution.
·
Simulation models imitate the behaviour of
the model over a period of time and measurements are made on the simulated
system.
Solution
of the model is not the final step because the operations researcher must
assess the reliability of the model.
Does
the model adequately predict the behaviour of the system that it is supposed to
represent? It may not be possible to
test validity for a new system except through the construction of a simulation
model, but validation may use past data or require the collection of new data.
The
model is based on a number of assumptions and estimates. If these cease to hold, then the solution
may not be the best solution. Sensitivity
Analysis determines how sensitive the optimal solution is to certain
parameters in the model. We must set up
a system for detecting changes before we:
The
mathematical solution must be translated into directives for action and
communicated adequately to operating personnel. This will be more effective if the operators have been involved
in the development of the plan from the first stage. Cases have been reported where a great deal of otherwise good
work by an O.R. team was sabotaged by the people affected by a changed system
they did not understand and hence did not want.
|
|
Frequency of Use - percent |
||
|
Method |
Not at all |
Sometimes |
Often |
Economic Analysis |
3 |
25 |
72 |
|
Statistical Analysis |
6 |
27 |
67 |
|
Simulation |
15 |
35 |
50 |
|
Linear Programming |
27 |
50 |
23 |
|
Inventory Control Theory |
34 |
45 |
21 |
|
PERT/CPM |
41 |
38 |
21 |
|
Mathematical Programming |
55 |
34 |
11 |
|
Search Techniques |
60 |
35 |
5 |
|
Queueing Theory |
63 |
31 |
6 |
|
Game Theory |
84 |
14 |
2 |
|
|
A
1977 survey of non-academic members of the Operations Research Society of
America (ORSA) and The Institute of Management Science (TIMS) found that many
methods were very frequently used. (See
Table 1.) Another question explored the
results obtained from using the techniques.
(See Table 2.) Not surprisingly
the methods which consistently produced the most favourable results were also
the ones which are most frequently used.
Table 1: How frequently Quantitative
Methods are used.
Table 2: User Satisfaction with Quantitative Methods.
|
|
Percent of users who evaluate methods as |
|||
|
Method |
Poor |
Fair |
Good |
Uncertain |
|
Economic Analysis |
1 |
20 |
78 |
1 |
|
Statistical Analysis |
1 |
17 |
80 |
2 |
|
Simulation |
3 |
20 |
73 |
4 |
|
Linear Programming |
14 |
28 |
49 |
9 |
|
Inventory Control Theory |
9 |
36 |
51 |
4 |
|
PERT/CPM |
10 |
40 |
47 |
3 |
|
Mathematical Programming |
7 |
33 |
56 |
5 |
|
Search Techniques |
6 |
33 |
56 |
5 |
|
Queueing Theory |
7 |
24 |
60 |
9 |
|
Game Theory |
21 |
31 |
26 |
22 |
Source: Gallagher, C. A., and Watson, H. J.,
Quantitative Methods for Business Decisions, (McGraw-Hill, 1985). Survey carried out by H. J. Watson and J.
M. Baecher.
It’s about time that this
research was updated. Anyone game
enough!
[1] Saaty, T.L., (1959), Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, McGraw-Hill.
[2] Wagner, H.M., (1975), Principles of Operations Research, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall.
[3] Ackoff, R.L. & Sasieni, . (1968), Fundamentals of Operations Research, Wiley.
[4] Taylor, F.W., (1911), The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper, New York, reprinted by Norton (1967) (RMIT/CTRL 658 T241)
[5] Gilbreth F. & Gilbreth, L., publications from 1980-1917 reprinted in The Writing of the Gilbreths, ed. W.R. Spiegel & C.E. Myers, (1953), R.D. Irwin, Homewood Ill. (RMIT/CTRL 658.5 G466)
[6] Gantt, H.L. various works circa 1916 reprinted in Gantt o Management: Guide for Today’s Executive, 1961, New York American Management Association (RMIT/CTRL 658 G211)
[7] Fayol, H., (1930), Industrial and General Administration, Pitman, London reprinted by the New York Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, C1984, RMIT/CTRL 658 F285